Epsagon vs Faddom
Epsagon vs Faddom, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Epsagon is on 62/100 and Faddom on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Epsagon
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $30.1M against $14.0M
Faddom
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 72 against 16
- headcount growth: +24.4% against -21.9%
- LinkedIn following: 10,911 against 7,042
At a glance
| Measure | Epsagon | Faddom |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated observability and tracing for microservices to fix issues faster. | Frictionless application observability platform for the secure era. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Serverless, Microservices | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Observability, Application Performance Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Epsagon | Faddom |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 16 | 72 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -21.9% | +24.4% |
| Total funding | $30.1M | $14.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| Valuation | $200M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,042 | 10,911 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Epsagon | Faddom |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Epsagon | Faddom |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
Epsagon vs Faddom: common questions
Which is better, Epsagon or Faddom?
On our 0-100 score Epsagon rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Epsagon and Faddom compare on the numbers?
Epsagon leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), domain rating (64/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($30.1M against $14.0M). Faddom leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 22/100), headcount (72 against 16), headcount growth (+24.4% against -21.9%), LinkedIn following (10,911 against 7,042).
Read the full Epsagon review and pricing or the Faddom review and pricing. You can also browse other Epsagon alternatives we track.