Epps vs QuintoAndar
Epps vs QuintoAndar, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Epps is on 35/100 and QuintoAndar on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Epps
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
QuintoAndar
- our overall score: 59/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 45/100
At a glance
| Measure | Epps | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | One AI operating system for institutional real estate: acquisitions, development, investment & asset management, investor reporting, and governance workflows. | Brazilian proptech platform simplifying real estate rentals and sales through technology. |
| Category | Proptech, Construction Tech, AI Infrastructure, Workflow Automation | Proptech, Real Estate Technology, Marketplace, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2013 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Epps | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $744M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E (Extension) |
| Valuation | Not published | $5.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Epps | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 6/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Epps | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | AWS |
| CDN | Netlify | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
Epps vs QuintoAndar: common questions
Which is better, Epps or QuintoAndar?
On our 0-100 score QuintoAndar rates higher (59/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Epps and QuintoAndar compare on the numbers?
QuintoAndar leads on our overall score (59/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 45/100).
Read the full Epps review and pricing or the QuintoAndar review and pricing. You can also browse other Epps alternatives we track.