Epocrates vs K Health
Epocrates vs K Health, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Epocrates is on 69/100 and K Health on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Epocrates
- our overall score: 69/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 26/100
K Health
- funding raised: $372M against $175M
At a glance
| Measure | Epocrates | K Health |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A widely used mobile medical reference application for healthcare professionals. | K Health is an AI-driven primary care company providing 24/7 virtual healthcare solutions to millions in the U.S. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Clinical Decision Support, Mobile Health | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Primary Care, Virtual Care |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 1998 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Epocrates | K Health |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 380 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +5.1% |
| Total funding | $175M | $372M |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Series G |
| Valuation | Not published | $900M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 50,830 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Epocrates | K Health |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 17/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Epocrates | K Health |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
Epocrates vs K Health: common questions
Which is better, Epocrates or K Health?
On our 0-100 score Epocrates rates higher (69/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Epocrates and K Health compare on the numbers?
Epocrates leads on our overall score (69/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (38/100 against 26/100). K Health leads on funding raised ($372M against $175M).
Read the full Epocrates review and pricing or the K Health review and pricing. You can also browse other Epocrates alternatives we track.