Epocrates vs HealthTap
Epocrates vs HealthTap, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Epocrates is on 69/100 and HealthTap on 40/100.
Where each one leads
Epocrates
- our overall score: 69/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 25/100
- funding raised: $175M against $66.3M
HealthTap
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Epocrates | HealthTap |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A widely used mobile medical reference application for healthcare professionals. | Virtual primary care platform connecting patients with doctors for affordable, ongoing healthcare. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Clinical Decision Support, Mobile Health | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Digital Health, Virtual Primary Care |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 1998 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | Sunnyvale, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Epocrates | HealthTap |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $175M | $66.3M |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Later Stage VC |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Epocrates | HealthTap |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | 17/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 14/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Epocrates | HealthTap |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
Epocrates vs HealthTap: common questions
Which is better, Epocrates or HealthTap?
On our 0-100 score Epocrates rates higher (69/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Epocrates and HealthTap compare on the numbers?
Epocrates leads on our overall score (69/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (38/100 against 25/100), funding raised ($175M against $66.3M).
Read the full Epocrates review and pricing or the HealthTap review and pricing. You can also browse other Epocrates alternatives we track.

