Epic Systems vs Redox
Epic Systems vs Redox, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Epic Systems is on 67/100 and Redox on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Epic Systems
- our overall score: 67/100 against 63/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 17,231 against 362
- LinkedIn following: 1,049,403 against 19,630
Redox
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 31/100
- funding raised: $156M against $70K
At a glance
| Measure | Epic Systems | Redox |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leading healthcare software company specializing in electronic health records and integrated patient care solutions. | API for healthcare data integration, connecting disparate systems seamlessly. |
| Category | Health Informatics, Enterprise Software, Healthcare Software, EHR | HealthTech, MedTech, API Platform, Data Integration |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 1979 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Verona, United States | Madison, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Epic Systems | Redox |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17,231 | 362 |
| Total funding | $70K | $156M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,049,403 | 19,630 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Epic Systems | Redox |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 44/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Epic Systems | Redox |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
Epic Systems vs Redox: common questions
Which is better, Epic Systems or Redox?
On our 0-100 score Epic Systems rates higher (67/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Epic Systems and Redox compare on the numbers?
Epic Systems leads on our overall score (67/100 against 63/100), domain rating (83/100 against 40/100), headcount (17,231 against 362), LinkedIn following (1,049,403 against 19,630). Redox leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 31/100), funding raised ($156M against $70K).
Read the full Epic Systems review and pricing or the Redox review and pricing. You can also browse other Epic Systems alternatives we track.