Epic Systems Corporation vs Phreesia
Epic Systems Corporation vs Phreesia, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Epic Systems Corporation is on 20/100 and Phreesia on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Epic Systems Corporation
- domain rating: 83/100 against 71/100
- headcount: 17,501 against 1,532
- LinkedIn following: 1,073,648 against 68,147
Phreesia
- our overall score: 61/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 32/100
At a glance
| Measure | Epic Systems Corporation | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Epic Systems Corporation develops and sells electronic health record software for healthcare organizations. | A healthcare software platform automating patient check-in, scheduling, payments, and administrative tasks. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Electronic Health Records, Healthcare Software | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Healthcare Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1979 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Verona, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Epic Systems Corporation | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17,501 | 1,532 |
| Total funding | Not published | $120M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,073,648 | 68,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Epic Systems Corporation | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 20/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Epic Systems Corporation | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Epic Systems Corporation vs Phreesia: common questions
Which is better, Epic Systems Corporation or Phreesia?
On our 0-100 score Phreesia rates higher (61/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Epic Systems Corporation and Phreesia compare on the numbers?
Epic Systems Corporation leads on domain rating (83/100 against 71/100), headcount (17,501 against 1,532), LinkedIn following (1,073,648 against 68,147). Phreesia leads on our overall score (61/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 32/100).
Read the full Epic Systems Corporation review and pricing or the Phreesia review and pricing. You can also browse other Epic Systems Corporation alternatives we track.