ENTER vs Ivo
ENTER vs Ivo, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ENTER is on 69/100 and Ivo on 57/100.
Where each one leads
ENTER
- our overall score: 69/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 206 against 117
- funding raised: $136M against $77.2M
- LinkedIn following: 24,268 against 13,869
Ivo
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 43/100 against 29/100
At a glance
| Measure | ENTER | Ivo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI agents for mass litigation, automating legal defenses for large companies in Brazil. | An AI-powered contract intelligence platform helping enterprise legal teams streamline contract review and negotiation. |
| Category | LegalTech, AI Agent, Workflow Automation, Document Automation | LegalTech, AI-powered Contract Review, Contract Intelligence, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | São Paulo, Brazil | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ENTER | Ivo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 206 | 117 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $136M | $77.2M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.2B | $355M |
| LinkedIn followers | 24,268 | 13,869 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ENTER | Ivo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 23/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ENTER | Ivo |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
ENTER vs Ivo: common questions
Which is better, ENTER or Ivo?
On our 0-100 score ENTER rates higher (69/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ENTER and Ivo compare on the numbers?
ENTER leads on our overall score (69/100 against 57/100), headcount (206 against 117), funding raised ($136M against $77.2M), LinkedIn following (24,268 against 13,869). Ivo leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 44/100), domain rating (43/100 against 29/100).
Read the full ENTER review and pricing or the Ivo review and pricing. You can also browse other ENTER alternatives we track.