Ent Security vs Puck
Ent Security vs Puck, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ent Security is on 50/100 and Puck on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Ent Security
- domain rating: 30/100 against 10/100
Puck
- agent readiness: 74/100 against 48/100
At a glance
| Measure | Ent Security | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intent-aware endpoint security that reads the intent behind user and AI agent actions before risky actions are completed. | Open-source, AI-driven endpoint investigation tool for security teams. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Endpoint Security, Threat Detection | Endpoint Security, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2024 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ent Security | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 74 |
| Total funding | $100M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ent Security | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | B (74/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ent Security | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | PostHog |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Ent Security vs Puck: common questions
Which is better, Ent Security or Puck?
On our 0-100 score Puck rates higher (52/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ent Security and Puck compare on the numbers?
Ent Security leads on domain rating (30/100 against 10/100). Puck leads on agent readiness (74/100 against 48/100).
Read the full Ent Security review and pricing or the Puck review and pricing. You can also browse other Ent Security alternatives we track.