Ent AI vs RedAccess
Ent AI vs RedAccess, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ent AI is on 48/100 and RedAccess on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Ent AI
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 32/100
- funding raised: $112M against $1.5M
RedAccess
- domain rating: 38/100 against 28/100
- headcount: 46 against 12
- LinkedIn following: 2,863 against 882
At a glance
| Measure | Ent AI | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intent-aware security for enterprises, reimagining threat detection for every action, workflow, and user. | Cybersecurity firm specializing in discovering publicly accessible assets and shadow AI risks. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Cloud Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ent AI | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 46 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -100.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $112M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 882 | 2,863 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ent AI | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 48/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ent AI | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Ent AI | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Ent AI vs RedAccess: common questions
Which is better, Ent AI or RedAccess?
On our 0-100 score Ent AI rates higher (48/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ent AI and RedAccess compare on the numbers?
Ent AI leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 32/100), funding raised ($112M against $1.5M). RedAccess leads on domain rating (38/100 against 28/100), headcount (46 against 12), LinkedIn following (2,863 against 882).
Read the full Ent AI review and pricing or the RedAccess review and pricing. You can also browse other Ent AI alternatives we track.