Ent AI vs Puck
Ent AI vs Puck, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ent AI is on 48/100 and Puck on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Ent AI
- domain rating: 28/100 against 10/100
Puck
- our overall score: 52/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 74/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 74 against 12
At a glance
| Measure | Ent AI | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intent-aware security for enterprises, reimagining threat detection for every action, workflow, and user. | Open-source, AI-driven endpoint investigation tool for security teams. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security | Endpoint Security, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ent AI | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 74 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -100.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $112M | Not published |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 882 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ent AI | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | B (74/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ent AI | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | PostHog |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Ent AI | Puck |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Ent AI vs Puck: common questions
Which is better, Ent AI or Puck?
On our 0-100 score Puck rates higher (52/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ent AI and Puck compare on the numbers?
Ent AI leads on domain rating (28/100 against 10/100). Puck leads on our overall score (52/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (74/100 against 52/100), headcount (74 against 12).
Read the full Ent AI review and pricing or the Puck review and pricing. You can also browse other Ent AI alternatives we track.