ENS (Ethereum Name Service) vs Immutable X
ENS (Ethereum Name Service) vs Immutable X, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ENS (Ethereum Name Service) is on 53/100 and Immutable X on 66/100.
Where each one leads
ENS (Ethereum Name Service)
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Immutable X
- our overall score: 66/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 26/100
- funding raised: $62.4M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Decentralized naming system for the Ethereum blockchain, mapping human-readable names to Ethereum addresses and Web3 resources. | A Layer 2 scaling solution for NFTs on Ethereum, offering gas-free minting and trading. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Identity | Web3, Blockchain, NFT, DeFi |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Melbourne, Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 213 |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $62.4M |
| Latest round | Grant | ICO |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 56,539 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) | Immutable X |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Plausible | PostHog |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Crypto Payments | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
ENS (Ethereum Name Service) vs Immutable X: common questions
Which is better, ENS (Ethereum Name Service) or Immutable X?
On our 0-100 score Immutable X rates higher (66/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ENS (Ethereum Name Service) and Immutable X compare on the numbers?
Immutable X leads on our overall score (66/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 26/100), funding raised ($62.4M against $1.0M).
Read the full ENS (Ethereum Name Service) review and pricing or the Immutable X review and pricing. You can also browse other ENS (Ethereum Name Service) alternatives we track.