ENS (Ethereum Name Service) vs Handshake

ENS (Ethereum Name Service) vs Handshake, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ENS (Ethereum Name Service) is on 53/100 and Handshake on 75/100.

ENS (Ethereum Name Service) logo
ENS (Ethereum Name Service)Decentralized naming system for the Ethereum blockchain, mapping human-readable names to Ethereum addresses and Web3 resources.
Try ENS (Ethereum Name Service)
Handshake logo
HandshakeThe career platform for Gen Z, connecting students, alumni, employers, and career educators for early career opportunities.
Try Handshake

Where each one leads

ENS (Ethereum Name Service)

Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.

Handshake

  • our overall score: 75/100 against 53/100
  • agent readiness: 44/100 against 26/100
  • funding raised: $432M against $1.0M

At a glance

MeasureENS (Ethereum Name Service)Handshake
What it isDecentralized naming system for the Ethereum blockchain, mapping human-readable names to Ethereum addresses and Web3 resources.The career platform for Gen Z, connecting students, alumni, employers, and career educators for early career opportunities.
CategoryWeb3, Blockchain, DeFi, IdentityHR Technology, Early Career Recruiting, University Recruiting, Talent Acquisition
Sells toBusiness modelB2CB2B
OfferingPlatformPlatform
Founded20172014
HeadquartersNot publishedNew York, United States
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureENS (Ethereum Name Service)Handshake
EmployeesNot published8,624
Headcount growthLast 12 monthsNot published+500.0%
Total funding$1.0M$432M
Latest roundGrantNot published
ValuationNot published$3.5B
LinkedIn followersNot published161,999

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureENS (Ethereum Name Service)Handshake
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating53/10075/100
Traction30/10060/100
Team70/10070/100
Search visibility2/10054/100
Quality68/10086/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteF (26/100)D (44/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10079/10082/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureENS (Ethereum Name Service)Handshake
HostingNot detectedVercel
CDNCloudflareVercel
FrameworksNext.js, Tailwind CSSNext.js, Tailwind CSS
AnalyticsPlausibleSegment
Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment railsCrypto PaymentsNot detected
Open sourceYesNo

Product and pricing

MeasureENS (Ethereum Name Service)Handshake
Key featuresNot publishedLargest network for early careers, AI-powered career tools, Automated job posting, Targeted candidate pooling

ENS (Ethereum Name Service) vs Handshake: common questions

Which is better, ENS (Ethereum Name Service) or Handshake?

On our 0-100 score Handshake rates higher (75/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do ENS (Ethereum Name Service) and Handshake compare on the numbers?

Handshake leads on our overall score (75/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 26/100), funding raised ($432M against $1.0M).

Read the full ENS (Ethereum Name Service) review and pricing or the Handshake review and pricing. You can also browse other ENS (Ethereum Name Service) alternatives we track.