Enevo vs GFL Environmental
Enevo vs GFL Environmental, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Enevo is on 48/100 and GFL Environmental on 29/100.
Where each one leads
Enevo
- our overall score: 48/100 against 29/100
GFL Environmental
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 47/100
- funding raised: $1.6B against $38.2M
At a glance
| Measure | Enevo | GFL Environmental |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enevo provides data analytics and logistics software for waste and recycling management. | North American environmental services company providing waste management, water, and soil solutions. |
| Category | Waste Management, IoT, Logistics, SaaS | Waste Management, Water Treatment, Soil Remediation, Environmental Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2010 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Vaughan, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Enevo | GFL Environmental |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 8,244 |
| Total funding | $38.2M | $1.6B |
| Latest round | Series B | Post IPO |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 173,203 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Enevo | GFL Environmental |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 15/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Enevo | GFL Environmental |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Enevo vs GFL Environmental: common questions
Which is better, Enevo or GFL Environmental?
On our 0-100 score Enevo rates higher (48/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Enevo and GFL Environmental compare on the numbers?
Enevo leads on our overall score (48/100 against 29/100). GFL Environmental leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 29/100), domain rating (72/100 against 47/100), funding raised ($1.6B against $38.2M).
Read the full Enevo review and pricing or the GFL Environmental review and pricing. You can also browse other Enevo alternatives we track.