Empatica vs Ultromics
Empatica vs Ultromics, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Empatica is on 64/100 and Ultromics on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Empatica
- our overall score: 64/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 49/100
- headcount: 122 against 84
- funding raised: $170M against $103M
- LinkedIn following: 42,805 against 9,821
Ultromics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Empatica | Ultromics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Wearable devices and AI for continuous health monitoring and early disease detection. | AI-powered software for cardiac ultrasound analysis and diagnosis. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Neurotech | HealthTech, MedTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Oxford, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Empatica | Ultromics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 122 | 84 |
| Total funding | $170M | $103M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 42,805 | 9,821 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Empatica | Ultromics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 59/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 83/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Empatica | Ultromics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Empatica vs Ultromics: common questions
Which is better, Empatica or Ultromics?
On our 0-100 score Empatica rates higher (64/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Empatica and Ultromics compare on the numbers?
Empatica leads on our overall score (64/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 39/100), domain rating (62/100 against 49/100), headcount (122 against 84), funding raised ($170M against $103M), LinkedIn following (42,805 against 9,821).
Read the full Empatica review and pricing or the Ultromics review and pricing. You can also browse other Empatica alternatives we track.