Emma Bridgewater vs Wrendale Designs
Emma Bridgewater vs Wrendale Designs, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Emma Bridgewater is on 54/100 and Wrendale Designs on 19/100.
Where each one leads
Emma Bridgewater
- our overall score: 54/100 against 19/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 65/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 160 against 46
- LinkedIn following: 13,182 against 1,718
Wrendale Designs
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Emma Bridgewater | Wrendale Designs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | British manufacturer of hand-decorated pottery and home goods, known for traditional techniques and iconic designs. | A UK-based company creating and selling gifts, stationery, and homeware featuring original watercolor animal illustrations. |
| Category | Retail, Home Goods, Ceramics, Pottery | Giftware, Homeware, Stationery, Illustration |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Product |
| Founded | 1985 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Stoke-on-Trent, England | Brigg, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Emma Bridgewater | Wrendale Designs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 160 | 46 |
| Total funding | $9.6M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,182 | 1,718 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Emma Bridgewater | Wrendale Designs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 19/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 17/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 74/100 | 22/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | F (29/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Emma Bridgewater | Wrendale Designs |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Shopify | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Klarna | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Emma Bridgewater | Wrendale Designs |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 5 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“[FO] he's a fun-gi by Bothy threads and wrendale designs.”r/CrossStitch
Emma Bridgewater vs Wrendale Designs: common questions
Which is better, Emma Bridgewater or Wrendale Designs?
On our 0-100 score Emma Bridgewater rates higher (54/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Emma Bridgewater and Wrendale Designs compare on the numbers?
Emma Bridgewater leads on our overall score (54/100 against 19/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 29/100), domain rating (65/100 against 54/100), headcount (160 against 46), LinkedIn following (13,182 against 1,718).
What do real users say about Emma Bridgewater and Wrendale Designs?
Wrendale Designs: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/CrossStitch.
Read the full Emma Bridgewater review and pricing or the Wrendale Designs review and pricing. You can also browse other Emma Bridgewater alternatives we track.