Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) vs Payhawk
Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) vs Payhawk, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) is on 50/100 and Payhawk on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus)
- domain rating: 74/100 against 66/100
Payhawk
- our overall score: 61/100 against 50/100
At a glance
| Measure | Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Emburse provides a suite of expense management and accounts payable solutions for businesses. | All-in-one spend management platform for businesses, simplifying expenses, cards, and payments. |
| Category | Fintech, Expense Management, Accounts Payable, Corporate Cards | Fintech, Payments, Corporate Cards, Expense Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Los Angeles, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 459 |
| Total funding | $95.0M | $81.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Bridge |
| Valuation | Not published | $575M |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,322 | 77,638 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) vs Payhawk: common questions
Which is better, Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) or Payhawk?
On our 0-100 score Payhawk rates higher (61/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) and Payhawk compare on the numbers?
Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) leads on domain rating (74/100 against 66/100). Payhawk leads on our overall score (61/100 against 50/100).
Read the full Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) review and pricing or the Payhawk review and pricing. You can also browse other Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) alternatives we track.