Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) vs Mesh Payments

Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) vs Mesh Payments, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) is on 50/100 and Mesh Payments on 62/100.

Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) logo
Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus)Emburse provides a suite of expense management and accounts payable solutions for businesses.
Try Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus)
Mesh Payments logo
Mesh PaymentsModern corporate spend management platform for global enterprises, simplifying travel and expense.
Try Mesh Payments

Where each one leads

Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus)

  • domain rating: 74/100 against 51/100
  • LinkedIn following: 64,322 against 18,496

Mesh Payments

  • our overall score: 62/100 against 50/100
  • funding raised: $123M against $95.0M

At a glance

MeasureEmburse Spend (formerly Abacus)Mesh Payments
What it isEmburse provides a suite of expense management and accounts payable solutions for businesses.Modern corporate spend management platform for global enterprises, simplifying travel and expense.
CategoryFintech, Expense Management, Accounts Payable, Corporate CardsFintech, Enterprise, Payments, Finance
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B
OfferingSoftwareSoftware
Founded20112018
HeadquartersLos Angeles, United StatesNew York, United States
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureEmburse Spend (formerly Abacus)Mesh Payments
EmployeesNot published150
Headcount growthLast 12 monthsNot published-5.8%
Total funding$95.0M$123M
Latest roundSeries CSeries C
LinkedIn followers64,32218,496

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureEmburse Spend (formerly Abacus)Mesh Payments
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating50/10062/100
Traction40/10060/100
TeamNot published60/100
Search visibility35/10034/100
Quality68/10068/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (51/100)D (47/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10074/10051/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureEmburse Spend (formerly Abacus)Mesh Payments
HostingVercelNot detected
CDNVercelCloudflare
CMSNot detectedWordPress
FrameworksNext.js, Tailwind CSSJquery
AnalyticsNot detectedMicrosoft Clarity
Support stackNot detectedHubSpot

Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) vs Mesh Payments: common questions

Which is better, Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) or Mesh Payments?

On our 0-100 score Mesh Payments rates higher (62/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) and Mesh Payments compare on the numbers?

Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) leads on domain rating (74/100 against 51/100), LinkedIn following (64,322 against 18,496). Mesh Payments leads on our overall score (62/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($123M against $95.0M).

Read the full Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) review and pricing or the Mesh Payments review and pricing. You can also browse other Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) alternatives we track.