Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) vs Float financial
Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) vs Float financial, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) is on 50/100 and Float financial on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus)
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 44/100
Float financial
- our overall score: 57/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $159M against $95.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) | Float financial |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Emburse provides a suite of expense management and accounts payable solutions for businesses. | A Canadian business finance platform offering corporate cards, expense management, and high-yield accounts. |
| Category | Fintech, Expense Management, Accounts Payable, Corporate Cards | Fintech, Payments, Corporate Cards, Expense Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Los Angeles, United States | Toronto, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) | Float financial |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 193 |
| Total funding | $95.0M | $159M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,322 | 57,925 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) | Float financial |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 43/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) | Float financial |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) vs Float financial: common questions
Which is better, Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) or Float financial?
On our 0-100 score Float financial rates higher (57/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) and Float financial compare on the numbers?
Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 44/100). Float financial leads on our overall score (57/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($159M against $95.0M).
Read the full Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) review and pricing or the Float financial review and pricing. You can also browse other Emburse Spend (formerly Abacus) alternatives we track.