Firefly Neuroscience vs Valerahealth
Firefly Neuroscience vs Valerahealth, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Firefly Neuroscience is on 56/100 and Valerahealth on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Firefly Neuroscience
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 42/100
- funding raised: $45.4M against $15.4M
Valerahealth
- domain rating: 47/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 228 against 25
- LinkedIn following: 11,920 against 8,237
At a glance
| Measure | Firefly Neuroscience | Valerahealth |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Firefly Neuroscience provides objective brain function assessments for mental illness using FDA-cleared Brain Network Analytics (BNA™) technology. | Personalized mental health services combining therapy, meditation, and medication with technology. |
| Category | Healthcare, Neurology, Mental Health, Brain EEG Injury | Healthcare, Neurology, Mental Health, Mental Health Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2006 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Firefly Neuroscience | Valerahealth |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 25 | 228 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $45.4M | $15.4M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,237 | 11,920 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Firefly Neuroscience | Valerahealth |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Firefly Neuroscience | Valerahealth |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Helpscout |
Firefly Neuroscience vs Valerahealth: common questions
Which is better, Firefly Neuroscience or Valerahealth?
On our 0-100 score Firefly Neuroscience rates higher (56/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Firefly Neuroscience and Valerahealth compare on the numbers?
Firefly Neuroscience leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 42/100), funding raised ($45.4M against $15.4M). Valerahealth leads on domain rating (47/100 against 38/100), headcount (228 against 25), LinkedIn following (11,920 against 8,237).
Read the full Firefly Neuroscience review and pricing or the Valerahealth review and pricing. You can also browse other Firefly Neuroscience alternatives we track.