Firefly Neuroscience vs Inner Cosmos
Firefly Neuroscience vs Inner Cosmos, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Firefly Neuroscience is on 56/100 and Inner Cosmos on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Firefly Neuroscience
- domain rating: 38/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 25 against 15
- funding raised: $45.4M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 8,237 against 1,815
Inner Cosmos
- headcount growth: +2.1% against -3.3%
At a glance
| Measure | Firefly Neuroscience | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Firefly Neuroscience provides objective brain function assessments for mental illness using FDA-cleared Brain Network Analytics (BNA™) technology. | Developing a digital pill to rebalance brain networks using imperceptible micro-stimulations. |
| Category | Healthcare, Neurology, Mental Health, Brain EEG Injury | Healthcare, Brain, Sensor, Human Machine Interface |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2006 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Firefly Neuroscience | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 25 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.3% | +2.1% |
| Total funding | $45.4M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,237 | 1,815 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Firefly Neuroscience | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 26/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Firefly Neuroscience | Inner Cosmos |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Hetzner |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Hotjar |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Firefly Neuroscience vs Inner Cosmos: common questions
Which is better, Firefly Neuroscience or Inner Cosmos?
On our 0-100 score Firefly Neuroscience rates higher (56/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Firefly Neuroscience and Inner Cosmos compare on the numbers?
Firefly Neuroscience leads on domain rating (38/100 against 26/100), headcount (25 against 15), funding raised ($45.4M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (8,237 against 1,815). Inner Cosmos leads on headcount growth (+2.1% against -3.3%).
Read the full Firefly Neuroscience review and pricing or the Inner Cosmos review and pricing. You can also browse other Firefly Neuroscience alternatives we track.

