Elliptic vs Fraud.net
Elliptic vs Fraud.net, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Elliptic is on 63/100 and Fraud.net on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Elliptic
- our overall score: 63/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 68/100
- headcount: 245 against 64
- funding raised: $210M against $2.2M
- LinkedIn following: 47,829 against 9,478
Fraud.net
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Elliptic | Fraud.net |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Blockchain analytics and crypto compliance solutions for enterprise risk management. | AI-driven platform for real-time fraud detection, risk management, and compliance. |
| Category | Fintech, Blockchain, Cybersecurity, Compliance | Fintech, Payments, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | services | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Elliptic | Fraud.net |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 245 | 64 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +91.3% | Not published |
| Open roles | 31 | Not published |
| Total funding | $210M | $2.2M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $670M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 47,829 | 9,478 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Elliptic | Fraud.net |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Elliptic | Fraud.net |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Nuxt | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Elliptic | Fraud.net |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 4 positive, 0 negative across 4 threads |
“Fraud.net's AI and Machine Learning Models offers an extensive range of solutions aimed at fraud detection and prevention. Leaning heavily on artificial intelligence and machine learning including deep learning and neural networks in combin”r/FutureTechFinds
Elliptic vs Fraud.net: common questions
Which is better, Elliptic or Fraud.net?
On our 0-100 score Elliptic rates higher (63/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Elliptic and Fraud.net compare on the numbers?
Elliptic leads on our overall score (63/100 against 53/100), domain rating (76/100 against 68/100), headcount (245 against 64), funding raised ($210M against $2.2M), LinkedIn following (47,829 against 9,478).
What do real users say about Elliptic and Fraud.net?
Fraud.net: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/FutureTechFinds.
Read the full Elliptic review and pricing or the Fraud.net review and pricing. You can also browse other Elliptic alternatives we track.