Elicit vs GatePhys
Elicit vs GatePhys, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Elicit is on 62/100 and GatePhys on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Elicit
- our overall score: 62/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 52 against 10
- funding raised: $31.0M against $2.0M
GatePhys
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 35/100
At a glance
| Measure | Elicit | GatePhys |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered research assistant for scientific literature review and data extraction. | Transforms advanced physical principles into patentable technological concepts using theoretical researchers, specialized AI, and numerical simulation. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Biotechnology, Pharmaceuticals, Research & Development | Theoretical Physics, Scientific AI, Numerical Simulation, Deep-Tech Innovation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Oakland, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Elicit | GatePhys |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 52 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -36.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $31.0M | $2.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| Valuation | $100M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,026 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Elicit | GatePhys |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 42/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Elicit | GatePhys |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Elicit vs GatePhys: common questions
Which is better, Elicit or GatePhys?
On our 0-100 score Elicit rates higher (62/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Elicit and GatePhys compare on the numbers?
Elicit leads on our overall score (62/100 against 38/100), headcount (52 against 10), funding raised ($31.0M against $2.0M). GatePhys leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 35/100).
Read the full Elicit review and pricing or the GatePhys review and pricing. You can also browse other Elicit alternatives we track.