Elasticsearch vs Swiftype
Elasticsearch vs Swiftype, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Elasticsearch is on 85/100 and Swiftype on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Elasticsearch
- our overall score: 85/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 74/100
- headcount: 5,066 against 5
- funding raised: $104M against $16.4M
- LinkedIn following: 533,425 against 1,563
Swiftype
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Swiftype |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source search and analytics engine for data exploration and real-time insights. | Developer-friendly search platform for applications, websites, and enterprises. |
| Category | Search Engine, Data Analytics, Log Management, Observability | Enterprise Software, API Platform, Search Engine, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Swiftype |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,066 | 5 |
| Total funding | $104M | $16.4M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 533,425 | 1,563 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Swiftype |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 85/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 44/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 24/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Swiftype |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Elasticsearch vs Swiftype: common questions
Which is better, Elasticsearch or Swiftype?
On our 0-100 score Elasticsearch rates higher (85/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Elasticsearch and Swiftype compare on the numbers?
Elasticsearch leads on our overall score (85/100 against 54/100), domain rating (90/100 against 74/100), headcount (5,066 against 5), funding raised ($104M against $16.4M), LinkedIn following (533,425 against 1,563). Swiftype leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 38/100).
Read the full Elasticsearch review and pricing or the Swiftype review and pricing. You can also browse other Elasticsearch alternatives we track.