Elasticsearch vs Pumadb
Elasticsearch vs Pumadb, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Elasticsearch is on 85/100 and Pumadb on 9/100.
Where each one leads
Elasticsearch
- our overall score: 85/100 against 9/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 3/100
Pumadb
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Pumadb |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source search and analytics engine for data exploration and real-time insights. | PumaDB offers an agent memory API that eliminates the need for database infrastructure, enabling agents to store durable JSON rows and review their memory. |
| Category | Search Engine, Data Analytics, Log Management, Observability | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Pumadb |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,066 | Not published |
| Total funding | $104M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 533,425 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Pumadb |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 85/100 | 9/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 12/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 3/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Pumadb |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Elasticsearch vs Pumadb: common questions
Which is better, Elasticsearch or Pumadb?
On our 0-100 score Elasticsearch rates higher (85/100 against 9/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Elasticsearch and Pumadb compare on the numbers?
Elasticsearch leads on our overall score (85/100 against 9/100), domain rating (90/100 against 3/100). Pumadb leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 38/100).
Read the full Elasticsearch review and pricing or the Pumadb review and pricing. You can also browse other Elasticsearch alternatives we track.