Elasticsearch vs Metabase
Elasticsearch vs Metabase, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Elasticsearch is on 85/100 and Metabase on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Elasticsearch
- our overall score: 85/100 against 60/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 5,066 against 125
- funding raised: $104M against $8.0M
- LinkedIn following: 533,425 against 27,996
Metabase
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source search and analytics engine for data exploration and real-time insights. | Open-source business intelligence and embedded analytics platform. |
| Category | Search Engine, Data Analytics, Log Management, Observability | Data Analytics, Business Intelligence, Analytics Platforms, Data Visualization Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,066 | 125 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +8.3% |
| Total funding | $104M | $8.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 533,425 | 27,996 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 85/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 55/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Elasticsearch vs Metabase: common questions
Which is better, Elasticsearch or Metabase?
On our 0-100 score Elasticsearch rates higher (85/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Elasticsearch and Metabase compare on the numbers?
Elasticsearch leads on our overall score (85/100 against 60/100), domain rating (90/100 against 78/100), headcount (5,066 against 125), funding raised ($104M against $8.0M), LinkedIn following (533,425 against 27,996). Metabase leads on agent readiness (58/100 against 38/100).
Read the full Elasticsearch review and pricing or the Metabase review and pricing. You can also browse other Elasticsearch alternatives we track.