Elasticsearch vs Glean
Elasticsearch vs Glean, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Elasticsearch is on 85/100 and Glean on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Elasticsearch
- our overall score: 85/100 against 69/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 5,066 against 1,475
- LinkedIn following: 533,425 against 130,056
Glean
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 38/100
- funding raised: $410M against $104M
At a glance
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source search and analytics engine for data exploration and real-time insights. | Glean is a Work AI platform that connects to all company data, enabling employees to find, create, and automate anything with AI assistants and agents. |
| Category | Search Engine, Data Analytics, Log Management, Observability | Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Search, Knowledge Management, Workplace AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Not published |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Palo Alto, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,066 | 1,475 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +88.0% |
| Total funding | $104M | $410M |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 533,425 | 130,056 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 85/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 56/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Elasticsearch | Glean |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Glean Assistant, Glean Agents, Glean Search, Glean Protect, Connectors, APIs |
Elasticsearch vs Glean: common questions
Which is better, Elasticsearch or Glean?
On our 0-100 score Elasticsearch rates higher (85/100 against 69/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Elasticsearch and Glean compare on the numbers?
Elasticsearch leads on our overall score (85/100 against 69/100), domain rating (90/100 against 78/100), headcount (5,066 against 1,475), LinkedIn following (533,425 against 130,056). Glean leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 38/100), funding raised ($410M against $104M).
Read the full Elasticsearch review and pricing or the Glean review and pricing. You can also browse other Elasticsearch alternatives we track.