eko vs Gling
eko vs Gling, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: eko is on 51/100 and Gling on 26/100.
Where each one leads
eko
- our overall score: 51/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 646 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 13,866 against 818
Gling
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | eko | Gling |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform for creating and publishing interactive, choice-driven video experiences. | AI-powered video editing tool that automatically removes silences and bad takes for creators. |
| Category | Media, E-commerce, Shopping, Content Discovery Platform | Media, Generative AI, Content Creation, Video Creation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | eko | Gling |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 646 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +35.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $77.2M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,866 | 818 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | eko | Gling |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 26/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 7/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | eko | Gling |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
eko vs Gling: common questions
Which is better, eko or Gling?
On our 0-100 score eko rates higher (51/100 against 26/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do eko and Gling compare on the numbers?
eko leads on our overall score (51/100 against 26/100), domain rating (72/100 against 53/100), headcount (646 against 4), LinkedIn following (13,866 against 818).
Read the full eko review and pricing or the Gling review and pricing. You can also browse other eko alternatives we track.