Efficient Frontier vs Magic Square
Efficient Frontier vs Magic Square, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Efficient Frontier is on 60/100 and Magic Square on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Efficient Frontier
- our overall score: 60/100 against 38/100
- agent readiness: 33/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 25/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 34 against 15
Magic Square
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Efficient Frontier | Magic Square |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Autonomous trading technology for crypto markets, optimizing millions in daily turnover. | A Web3 app store for discovering and earning rewards from decentralized applications, games, and AI agents. |
| Category | Fintech, Algorithmic Trading, Crypto, Trading | Fintech, Trading, Algorithmic Trading, AI-Driven Trading |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Singapore, Singapore | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Efficient Frontier | Magic Square |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 34 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -6.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,680 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Efficient Frontier | Magic Square |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 42/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Efficient Frontier | Magic Square |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Efficient Frontier vs Magic Square: common questions
Which is better, Efficient Frontier or Magic Square?
On our 0-100 score Efficient Frontier rates higher (60/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Efficient Frontier and Magic Square compare on the numbers?
Efficient Frontier leads on our overall score (60/100 against 38/100), agent readiness (33/100 against 22/100), domain rating (25/100 against 2/100), headcount (34 against 15).
Read the full Efficient Frontier review and pricing or the Magic Square review and pricing. You can also browse other Efficient Frontier alternatives we track.

