Efficient Frontier vs Ledger
Efficient Frontier vs Ledger, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Efficient Frontier is on 60/100 and Ledger on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Efficient Frontier
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Ledger
- our overall score: 69/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 85/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 802 against 34
- headcount growth: +11.3% against -6.8%
- funding raised: $572M against $2.0M
- LinkedIn following: 90,563 against 2,680
At a glance
| Measure | Efficient Frontier | Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Autonomous trading technology for crypto markets, optimizing millions in daily turnover. | Hardware and software solutions for secure management of digital assets and Web3 interactions. |
| Category | Fintech, Algorithmic Trading, Crypto, Trading | Fintech, Web3, Blockchain, DeFi |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware | software | platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Singapore, Singapore | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Efficient Frontier | Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 34 | 802 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -6.8% | +11.3% |
| Total funding | $2.0M | $572M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,680 | 90,563 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Efficient Frontier | Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 25/100 | 85/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Efficient Frontier | Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Shopify |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Efficient Frontier vs Ledger: common questions
Which is better, Efficient Frontier or Ledger?
On our 0-100 score Ledger rates higher (69/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Efficient Frontier and Ledger compare on the numbers?
Ledger leads on our overall score (69/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 33/100), domain rating (85/100 against 25/100), headcount (802 against 34), headcount growth (+11.3% against -6.8%), funding raised ($572M against $2.0M), LinkedIn following (90,563 against 2,680).
Read the full Efficient Frontier review and pricing or the Ledger review and pricing. You can also browse other Efficient Frontier alternatives we track.