EfA Technologies vs MeMed
EfA Technologies vs MeMed, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EfA Technologies is on 36/100 and MeMed on 61/100.
Where each one leads
EfA Technologies
- headcount growth: +3.0% against -8.4%
MeMed
- our overall score: 61/100 against 36/100
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 16/100
- headcount: 99 against 12
- LinkedIn following: 21,207 against 1,813
At a glance
| Measure | EfA Technologies | MeMed |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Portable, affordable, AI-powered hematology lab for instant blood test results. | MeMed develops and commercializes host immune response diagnostic solutions to address complex clinical dilemmas and improve patient outcomes. |
| Category | Blood, Healthcare, Medical Device, Diagnostics | Healthcare, Blood, Diagnostics, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2G |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tirat Carmel, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EfA Technologies | MeMed |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 99 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.0% | -8.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $196M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,813 | 21,207 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EfA Technologies | MeMed |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 36/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 11/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 16/100 | 46/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | EfA Technologies | MeMed |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
EfA Technologies vs MeMed: common questions
Which is better, EfA Technologies or MeMed?
On our 0-100 score MeMed rates higher (61/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EfA Technologies and MeMed compare on the numbers?
EfA Technologies leads on headcount growth (+3.0% against -8.4%). MeMed leads on our overall score (61/100 against 36/100), agent readiness (35/100 against 29/100), domain rating (46/100 against 16/100), headcount (99 against 12), LinkedIn following (21,207 against 1,813).
Read the full EfA Technologies review and pricing or the MeMed review and pricing. You can also browse other EfA Technologies alternatives we track.