EdgeQ vs Parallel Wireless
EdgeQ vs Parallel Wireless, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EdgeQ is on 62/100 and Parallel Wireless on 54/100.
Where each one leads
EdgeQ
- our overall score: 62/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $114M against $75.0M
Parallel Wireless
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 23/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 40/100
- LinkedIn following: 89,649 against 8,327
At a glance
| Measure | EdgeQ | Parallel Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provider of 5G and AI solutions on a single chip for edge networks. | Parallel Wireless is a leading OpenRAN company providing cloud-native 5G/4G/3G/2G OpenRAN architecture for mobile operators. |
| Category | 5G, AI Chip, Edge Computing, Semiconductor | OpenRAN, 5G, 4G, 3G |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, Greece | Nashua, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EdgeQ | Parallel Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 124 | Not published |
| Open roles | Not published | 35 |
| Total funding | $114M | $75.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,327 | 89,649 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EdgeQ | Parallel Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (23/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 40/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | EdgeQ | Parallel Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Freshdesk | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
EdgeQ vs Parallel Wireless: common questions
Which is better, EdgeQ or Parallel Wireless?
On our 0-100 score EdgeQ rates higher (62/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EdgeQ and Parallel Wireless compare on the numbers?
EdgeQ leads on our overall score (62/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($114M against $75.0M). Parallel Wireless leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 23/100), domain rating (49/100 against 40/100), LinkedIn following (89,649 against 8,327).
Read the full EdgeQ review and pricing or the Parallel Wireless review and pricing. You can also browse other EdgeQ alternatives we track.