Edauthor vs Fieldlens
Edauthor vs Fieldlens, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Edauthor is on 6/100 and Fieldlens on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Edauthor
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Fieldlens
- our overall score: 59/100 against 6/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 25/100
At a glance
| Measure | Edauthor | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Live group splitting, voting, chat, and session summaries for educators and facilitators. | Real-time jobsite collaboration software connecting field and office teams in construction. |
| Category | EdTech, Virtual Collaboration, Meeting Software, Education Technology | Construction Tech, Vertical SaaS, Project Management, Collaboration Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tampa, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Edauthor | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 99 |
| Total funding | Not published | $17.7M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 8,652 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Edauthor | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 6/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 25/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Edauthor | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Edauthor | Fieldlens |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 3 threads |
“WeWork has acquired 21 startups in the last four years, from a college messaging service to a real estate investing app. Here's everything WeWork has bought.. Spacious SpaceIQ Waltz Prolific Interactive Islands Media Managed by Q Euclid Ana”r/buzzfeedbot
Edauthor vs Fieldlens: common questions
Which is better, Edauthor or Fieldlens?
On our 0-100 score Fieldlens rates higher (59/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Edauthor and Fieldlens compare on the numbers?
Fieldlens leads on our overall score (59/100 against 6/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 25/100).
What do real users say about Edauthor and Fieldlens?
Fieldlens: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/buzzfeedbot.
Read the full Edauthor review and pricing or the Fieldlens review and pricing. You can also browse other Edauthor alternatives we track.