eCabs vs Gett
eCabs vs Gett, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: eCabs is on 22/100 and Gett on 54/100.
Where each one leads
eCabs
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 25/100
Gett
- our overall score: 54/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 852 against 176
- LinkedIn following: 55,257 against 5,609
At a glance
| Measure | eCabs | Gett |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Malta's pioneering mobility provider transforming urban transport with smart, technology-driven solutions. | Gett is a mobility technology company focused on solving complex urban transportation challenges with innovative solutions. |
| Category | Mobility, Ridesharing, Transportation, Logistics | Mobility, Transportation, Ridesharing, Fleet Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C, B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Valletta, Malta | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | eCabs | Gett |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 176 | 852 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -0.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $795M |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,609 | 55,257 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | eCabs | Gett |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 22/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | eCabs | Gett |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
eCabs vs Gett: common questions
Which is better, eCabs or Gett?
On our 0-100 score Gett rates higher (54/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do eCabs and Gett compare on the numbers?
eCabs leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 25/100). Gett leads on our overall score (54/100 against 22/100), domain rating (70/100 against 44/100), headcount (852 against 176), LinkedIn following (55,257 against 5,609).
Read the full eCabs review and pricing or the Gett review and pricing. You can also browse other eCabs alternatives we track.