Easyship vs WareMatch
Easyship vs WareMatch, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Easyship is on 57/100 and WareMatch on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Easyship
- our overall score: 57/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 195 against 13
- funding raised: $59.0M against $2.0M
- LinkedIn following: 16,770 against 1,126
WareMatch
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 44/100
At a glance
| Measure | Easyship | WareMatch |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global e-commerce shipping platform connecting merchants to hundreds of couriers worldwide. | Digitalizes industrial leasing and logistics coordination to optimize supply chains. |
| Category | LogisticsTech, E-commerce, Marketplace, API Platform | LogisticsTech, Marketplace, Supply Chain, Proptech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Easyship | WareMatch |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 195 | 13 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $59.0M | $2.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Early Stage VC |
| LinkedIn followers | 16,770 | 1,126 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Easyship | WareMatch |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 43/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 25/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Easyship | WareMatch |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Easyship | WareMatch |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Then we started working with Easyship (specifically their Swiss setup), and honestly… it’s been a game changer for us. Not only are the prices surprisingly fair compared to what we were paying before, but the service has been really solid a”r/ecommerces
Easyship vs WareMatch: common questions
Which is better, Easyship or WareMatch?
On our 0-100 score Easyship rates higher (57/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Easyship and WareMatch compare on the numbers?
Easyship leads on our overall score (57/100 against 49/100), domain rating (76/100 against 25/100), headcount (195 against 13), funding raised ($59.0M against $2.0M), LinkedIn following (16,770 against 1,126). WareMatch leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 44/100).
What do real users say about Easyship and WareMatch?
Easyship: 1 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ecommerces.
Read the full Easyship review and pricing or the WareMatch review and pricing. You can also browse other Easyship alternatives we track.