EasySend vs EXL
EasySend vs EXL, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EasySend is on 55/100 and EXL on 42/100.
Where each one leads
EasySend
- our overall score: 55/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 34/100
- funding raised: $71.5M against $10.0M
EXL
- domain rating: 70/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 57,550 against 56
- headcount growth: +17.9% against -18.4%
- LinkedIn following: 2,215,583 against 17,152
At a glance
| Measure | EasySend | EXL |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | No-code platform for transforming forms into digital customer experiences and automating workflows. | Global operations management and analytics company providing consulting, digital transformation, and outsourcing services. |
| Category | Insurance, Banking, Digital, CRM | Business Process Outsourcing, Analytics, Consulting, Digital Transformation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | services | platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EasySend | EXL |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 56 | 57,550 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -18.4% | +17.9% |
| Total funding | $71.5M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Debt | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,152 | 2,215,583 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EasySend | EXL |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 42/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 30/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | F (34/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | EasySend | EXL |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk, HubSpot | Not detected |
EasySend vs EXL: common questions
Which is better, EasySend or EXL?
On our 0-100 score EasySend rates higher (55/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EasySend and EXL compare on the numbers?
EasySend leads on our overall score (55/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 34/100), funding raised ($71.5M against $10.0M). EXL leads on domain rating (70/100 against 61/100), headcount (57,550 against 56), headcount growth (+17.9% against -18.4%), LinkedIn following (2,215,583 against 17,152).
Read the full EasySend review and pricing or the EXL review and pricing. You can also browse other EasySend alternatives we track.