Easyllama vs Kiteworks
Easyllama vs Kiteworks, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Easyllama is on 19/100 and Kiteworks on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Easyllama
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Kiteworks
- our overall score: 61/100 against 19/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 362 against 67
- LinkedIn following: 49,302 against 10,225
At a glance
| Measure | Easyllama | Kiteworks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Highest rated all-in-one compliance and security training platform with 450+ courses. | Securely manages sensitive content communications across email, file sharing, and APIs for enterprises. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Compliance Training, Employee Training, Enterprise Software | Cybersecurity, Secure Content Communication, Data Governance, Compliance Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Easyllama | Kiteworks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 67 | 362 |
| Total funding | Not published | $588M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,225 | 49,302 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Easyllama | Kiteworks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 19/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 18/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Easyllama | Kiteworks |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Easyllama vs Kiteworks: common questions
Which is better, Easyllama or Kiteworks?
On our 0-100 score Kiteworks rates higher (61/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Easyllama and Kiteworks compare on the numbers?
Kiteworks leads on our overall score (61/100 against 19/100), domain rating (77/100 against 59/100), headcount (362 against 67), LinkedIn following (49,302 against 10,225).
Read the full Easyllama review and pricing or the Kiteworks review and pricing. You can also browse other Easyllama alternatives we track.