Earth Observing System vs SupPlant
Earth Observing System vs SupPlant, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Earth Observing System is on 22/100 and SupPlant on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Earth Observing System
- domain rating: 73/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 138 against 55
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 22/100
- LinkedIn following: 15,340 against 10,018
At a glance
| Measure | Earth Observing System | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides Earth observation data and analysis services. | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. |
| Category | Geospatial Data, Earth Observation, Satellite Imagery, Environmental Monitoring | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Kyiv, Ukraine | Afula, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Earth Observing System | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 138 | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -13.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $62.9M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,018 | 15,340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Earth Observing System | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 22/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Earth Observing System | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Earth Observing System vs SupPlant: common questions
Which is better, Earth Observing System or SupPlant?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Earth Observing System and SupPlant compare on the numbers?
Earth Observing System leads on domain rating (73/100 against 38/100), headcount (138 against 55). SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 22/100), LinkedIn following (15,340 against 10,018).
Read the full Earth Observing System review and pricing or the SupPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other Earth Observing System alternatives we track.