Earnix vs Planck
Earnix vs Planck, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Earnix is on 62/100 and Planck on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Earnix
- domain rating: 64/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 453 against 75
- headcount growth: +8.6% against -7.5%
- funding raised: $219M against $71.0M
- LinkedIn following: 40,895 against 6,433
Planck
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Earnix | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global provider of intelligent insurance and banking operations with agile, composable, real-time solutions. | Commercial insurance data platform enabling instant and accurate business underwriting. |
| Category | Fintech, Insurance, Pricing, Analytics | Fintech, Insurance, Underwriting, InsurTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2001 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Earnix | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 453 | 75 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +8.6% | -7.5% |
| Total funding | $219M | $71.0M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.2B | $250M |
| LinkedIn followers | 40,895 | 6,433 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Earnix | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Earnix | Planck |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Fathom | Google Tag Manager |
Earnix vs Planck: common questions
Which is better, Earnix or Planck?
On our 0-100 score Planck rates higher (65/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Earnix and Planck compare on the numbers?
Earnix leads on domain rating (64/100 against 45/100), headcount (453 against 75), headcount growth (+8.6% against -7.5%), funding raised ($219M against $71.0M), LinkedIn following (40,895 against 6,433).
Read the full Earnix review and pricing or the Planck review and pricing. You can also browse other Earnix alternatives we track.