Earnix vs Leo
Earnix vs Leo, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Earnix is on 62/100 and Leo on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Earnix
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 453 against 147
- funding raised: $219M against $6.6M
- LinkedIn following: 40,895 against 2,538
Leo
- agent readiness: 62/100 against 41/100
- headcount growth: +103.7% against +8.6%
At a glance
| Measure | Earnix | Leo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global provider of intelligent insurance and banking operations with agile, composable, real-time solutions. | AI-powered customer service solution for the insurance industry, simplifying agent-consumer interactions. |
| Category | Fintech, Insurance, Pricing, Analytics | Fintech, Insurance, Management, Chatbot |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2001 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Earnix | Leo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 453 | 147 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +8.6% | +103.7% |
| Total funding | $219M | $6.6M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 40,895 | 2,538 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Earnix | Leo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | C (62/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Earnix | Leo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CMS | Not detected | Wix |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Fathom | Hotjar |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Earnix vs Leo: common questions
Which is better, Earnix or Leo?
On our 0-100 score Earnix rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Earnix and Leo compare on the numbers?
Earnix leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), domain rating (64/100 against 27/100), headcount (453 against 147), funding raised ($219M against $6.6M), LinkedIn following (40,895 against 2,538). Leo leads on agent readiness (62/100 against 41/100), headcount growth (+103.7% against +8.6%).
Read the full Earnix review and pricing or the Leo review and pricing. You can also browse other Earnix alternatives we track.