Earnix vs Five Sigma
Earnix vs Five Sigma, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Earnix is on 62/100 and Five Sigma on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Earnix
- our overall score: 62/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 453 against 41
- funding raised: $219M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 40,895 against 4,448
Five Sigma
- headcount growth: +13.3% against +8.6%
At a glance
| Measure | Earnix | Five Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global provider of intelligent insurance and banking operations with agile, composable, real-time solutions. | Innovative Claims Management System software for insurance carriers, MGAs, and TPAs. |
| Category | Fintech, Insurance, Pricing, Analytics | Fintech, Insurance, Management, Claims |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2001 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Earnix | Five Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 453 | 41 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +8.6% | +13.3% |
| Total funding | $219M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Secondary Transaction | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 40,895 | 4,448 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Earnix | Five Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Earnix | Five Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Fathom | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Earnix vs Five Sigma: common questions
Which is better, Earnix or Five Sigma?
On our 0-100 score Earnix rates higher (62/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Earnix and Five Sigma compare on the numbers?
Earnix leads on our overall score (62/100 against 50/100), domain rating (64/100 against 34/100), headcount (453 against 41), funding raised ($219M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (40,895 against 4,448). Five Sigma leads on headcount growth (+13.3% against +8.6%).
Read the full Earnix review and pricing or the Five Sigma review and pricing. You can also browse other Earnix alternatives we track.