EarlySense vs Project M
EarlySense vs Project M, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EarlySense is on 65/100 and Project M on 55/100.
Where each one leads
EarlySense
- our overall score: 65/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 18 against 7
- funding raised: $131M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 10,030 against 295
Project M
- headcount growth: +77.1% against -27.2%
At a glance
| Measure | EarlySense | Project M |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | EarlySense provides a continuous patient monitoring solution to enhance safety and reduce risk for general care patients. | Leveraging digital twins for real-time, individualized in-patient treatment optimization. |
| Category | Healthcare, Monitor, Patient, MedTech | Healthcare, Digital Twin, Clinical Development, Digital Twin Healthcare |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EarlySense | Project M |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 7 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.2% | +77.1% |
| Total funding | $131M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Bootstrapped |
| Valuation | $325M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,030 | 295 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EarlySense | Project M |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 11/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 44/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | Not published |
EarlySense vs Project M: common questions
Which is better, EarlySense or Project M?
On our 0-100 score EarlySense rates higher (65/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EarlySense and Project M compare on the numbers?
EarlySense leads on our overall score (65/100 against 55/100), headcount (18 against 7), funding raised ($131M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (10,030 against 295). Project M leads on headcount growth (+77.1% against -27.2%).
Read the full EarlySense review and pricing or the Project M review and pricing. You can also browse other EarlySense alternatives we track.