EarlySense vs Oxitone
EarlySense vs Oxitone, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EarlySense is on 65/100 and Oxitone on 49/100.
Where each one leads
EarlySense
- our overall score: 65/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 18 against 10
- funding raised: $131M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 10,030 against 1,282
Oxitone
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | EarlySense | Oxitone |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | EarlySense provides a continuous patient monitoring solution to enhance safety and reduce risk for general care patients. | Oxitone is a digital health company providing continuous remote care for people with severe chronic conditions using wearables. |
| Category | Healthcare, Monitor, Patient, MedTech | Healthcare, Patient, Monitoring, Wearable |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EarlySense | Oxitone |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $131M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Seed |
| Valuation | $325M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,030 | 1,282 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EarlySense | Oxitone |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | EarlySense | Oxitone |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
EarlySense vs Oxitone: common questions
Which is better, EarlySense or Oxitone?
On our 0-100 score EarlySense rates higher (65/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EarlySense and Oxitone compare on the numbers?
EarlySense leads on our overall score (65/100 against 49/100), domain rating (38/100 against 33/100), headcount (18 against 10), funding raised ($131M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (10,030 against 1,282). Oxitone leads on agent readiness (38/100 against 22/100).
Read the full EarlySense review and pricing or the Oxitone review and pricing. You can also browse other EarlySense alternatives we track.