EarlySense vs OutSense Diagnostics
EarlySense vs OutSense Diagnostics, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EarlySense is on 65/100 and OutSense Diagnostics on 51/100.
Where each one leads
EarlySense
- our overall score: 65/100 against 51/100
- funding raised: $131M against $2.7M
- LinkedIn following: 10,030 against 1,343
OutSense Diagnostics
- agent readiness: 29/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 43/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 23 against 18
At a glance
| Measure | EarlySense | OutSense Diagnostics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | EarlySense provides a continuous patient monitoring solution to enhance safety and reduce risk for general care patients. | Develops toilet-integrated diagnostic technology for early health condition detection. |
| Category | Healthcare, Monitor, Patient, MedTech | Healthcare, Personal, Toilet, Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EarlySense | OutSense Diagnostics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 23 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $131M | $2.7M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series A |
| Valuation | $325M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,030 | 1,343 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EarlySense | OutSense Diagnostics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (29/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | EarlySense | OutSense Diagnostics |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
EarlySense vs OutSense Diagnostics: common questions
Which is better, EarlySense or OutSense Diagnostics?
On our 0-100 score EarlySense rates higher (65/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EarlySense and OutSense Diagnostics compare on the numbers?
EarlySense leads on our overall score (65/100 against 51/100), funding raised ($131M against $2.7M), LinkedIn following (10,030 against 1,343). OutSense Diagnostics leads on agent readiness (29/100 against 22/100), domain rating (43/100 against 38/100), headcount (23 against 18).
Read the full EarlySense review and pricing or the OutSense Diagnostics review and pricing. You can also browse other EarlySense alternatives we track.