EarlySense vs MedAware
EarlySense vs MedAware, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EarlySense is on 65/100 and MedAware on 49/100.
Where each one leads
EarlySense
- our overall score: 65/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 18 against 9
- funding raised: $131M against $35.6M
- LinkedIn following: 10,030 against 2,143
MedAware
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | EarlySense | MedAware |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | EarlySense provides a continuous patient monitoring solution to enhance safety and reduce risk for general care patients. | MedAware provides AI-driven clinical decision support to prevent medication-related errors in healthcare. |
| Category | Healthcare, Monitor, Patient, MedTech | Prevention, Healthcare, Prescription Errors, Prescription |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EarlySense | MedAware |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 9 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.2% | -28.9% |
| Total funding | $131M | $35.6M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series A |
| Valuation | $325M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,030 | 2,143 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EarlySense | MedAware |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | EarlySense | MedAware |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
EarlySense vs MedAware: common questions
Which is better, EarlySense or MedAware?
On our 0-100 score EarlySense rates higher (65/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EarlySense and MedAware compare on the numbers?
EarlySense leads on our overall score (65/100 against 49/100), domain rating (38/100 against 33/100), headcount (18 against 9), funding raised ($131M against $35.6M), LinkedIn following (10,030 against 2,143).
Read the full EarlySense review and pricing or the MedAware review and pricing. You can also browse other EarlySense alternatives we track.