EarlySense vs Healthymize
EarlySense vs Healthymize, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EarlySense is on 65/100 and Healthymize on 21/100.
Where each one leads
EarlySense
- our overall score: 65/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 18 against 7
Healthymize
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | EarlySense | Healthymize |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | EarlySense provides a continuous patient monitoring solution to enhance safety and reduce risk for general care patients. | Personalized speech monitoring for early disease detection using voice and breathing analysis. |
| Category | Healthcare, Monitor, Patient, MedTech | Healthcare, Voice Analysis, Monitor, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B2C |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EarlySense | Healthymize |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 7 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $131M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $325M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,030 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EarlySense | Healthymize |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 21/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 9/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 12/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 10/100 |
EarlySense vs Healthymize: common questions
Which is better, EarlySense or Healthymize?
On our 0-100 score EarlySense rates higher (65/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EarlySense and Healthymize compare on the numbers?
EarlySense leads on our overall score (65/100 against 21/100), domain rating (38/100 against 10/100), headcount (18 against 7). Healthymize leads on agent readiness (36/100 against 22/100).
Read the full EarlySense review and pricing or the Healthymize review and pricing. You can also browse other EarlySense alternatives we track.