EarlySense vs Opmed.AI
EarlySense vs Opmed.AI, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: EarlySense is on 65/100 and Opmed.AI on 58/100.
Where each one leads
EarlySense
- our overall score: 65/100 against 58/100
- funding raised: $131M against $15.0M
Opmed.AI
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 64 against 18
- headcount growth: +72.2% against -27.2%
At a glance
| Measure | EarlySense | Opmed.AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | EarlySense provides a continuous patient monitoring solution to enhance safety and reduce risk for general care patients. | AI-powered platform optimizing healthcare planning and hospital operations, especially OR scheduling. |
| Category | Healthcare, Monitor, Patient, MedTech | Healthcare, Hospital, Optimization, Planning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Ramat Gan, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | EarlySense | Opmed.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 64 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -27.2% | +72.2% |
| Total funding | $131M | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series A |
| Valuation | $325M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,030 | 9,858 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | EarlySense | Opmed.AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 27/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | EarlySense | Opmed.AI |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
EarlySense vs Opmed.AI: common questions
Which is better, EarlySense or Opmed.AI?
On our 0-100 score EarlySense rates higher (65/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do EarlySense and Opmed.AI compare on the numbers?
EarlySense leads on our overall score (65/100 against 58/100), funding raised ($131M against $15.0M). Opmed.AI leads on agent readiness (40/100 against 22/100), headcount (64 against 18), headcount growth (+72.2% against -27.2%).
Read the full EarlySense review and pricing or the Opmed.AI review and pricing. You can also browse other EarlySense alternatives we track.