e-peas vs InterDigital
e-peas vs InterDigital, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: e-peas is on 55/100 and InterDigital on 50/100.
Where each one leads
e-peas
- our overall score: 55/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 49 against 25
InterDigital
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 51/100
- funding raised: $400M against $19.2M
At a glance
| Measure | e-peas | InterDigital |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Ultra-low-power energy harvesting and power management solutions for autonomous electronics. | InterDigital researches and licenses wireless, video, and AI technologies for connected devices and networks. |
| Category | Semiconductors, Internet of Things (IoT), Energy Harvesting, Power Management | Wireless Technology, Video Technology, Artificial Intelligence, IoT |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Services |
| Founded | 2014 | 1972 |
| Headquarters | Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium | Wilmington, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | e-peas | InterDigital |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 49 | 25 |
| Total funding | $19.2M | $400M |
| Latest round | Growth | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.9B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,964 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | e-peas | InterDigital |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | e-peas | InterDigital |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
e-peas vs InterDigital: common questions
Which is better, e-peas or InterDigital?
On our 0-100 score e-peas rates higher (55/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do e-peas and InterDigital compare on the numbers?
e-peas leads on our overall score (55/100 against 50/100), headcount (49 against 25). InterDigital leads on agent readiness (40/100 against 21/100), domain rating (62/100 against 51/100), funding raised ($400M against $19.2M).
Read the full e-peas review and pricing or the InterDigital review and pricing. You can also browse other e-peas alternatives we track.