Dynatrace vs Riverbed Technology
Dynatrace vs Riverbed Technology, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dynatrace is on 63/100 and Riverbed Technology on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Dynatrace
- our overall score: 63/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 5,938 against 1,589
- funding raised: $333M against $100M
Riverbed Technology
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Dynatrace | Riverbed Technology |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered observability platform for monitoring cloud applications and infrastructure. | Unified observability platform for autonomous IT operations. |
| Category | Cloud Monitoring & Observability | Network Management, Observability, Artificial Intelligence, IT Operations Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | 2005 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | San Jose, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dynatrace | Riverbed Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,938 | 1,589 |
| Total funding | $333M | $100M |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Private Equity |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 118,733 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dynatrace | Riverbed Technology |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dynatrace | Riverbed Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | Khoros | Not detected |
Dynatrace vs Riverbed Technology: common questions
Which is better, Dynatrace or Riverbed Technology?
On our 0-100 score Dynatrace rates higher (63/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dynatrace and Riverbed Technology compare on the numbers?
Dynatrace leads on our overall score (63/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 42/100), headcount (5,938 against 1,589), funding raised ($333M against $100M).
Read the full Dynatrace review and pricing or the Riverbed Technology review and pricing. You can also browse other Dynatrace alternatives we track.