Dynatrace vs Grafana Cloud
Dynatrace vs Grafana Cloud, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dynatrace is on 63/100 and Grafana Cloud on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Dynatrace
- headcount: 5,938 against 1,842
Grafana Cloud
- our overall score: 69/100 against 63/100
- funding raised: $2.1B against $333M
At a glance
| Measure | Dynatrace | Grafana Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered observability platform for monitoring cloud applications and infrastructure. | Full-stack observability platform built on open standards for unifying telemetry and accelerating troubleshooting. |
| Category | Cloud Monitoring & Observability | Observability, Monitoring, Data Visualization, Cloud Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | 2005 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dynatrace | Grafana Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,938 | 1,842 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +9.3% |
| Total funding | $333M | $2.1B |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $6.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 285,029 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dynatrace | Grafana Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 89/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dynatrace | Grafana Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | Discourse |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Dynatrace vs Grafana Cloud: common questions
Which is better, Dynatrace or Grafana Cloud?
On our 0-100 score Grafana Cloud rates higher (69/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dynatrace and Grafana Cloud compare on the numbers?
Dynatrace leads on headcount (5,938 against 1,842). Grafana Cloud leads on our overall score (69/100 against 63/100), funding raised ($2.1B against $333M).
Read the full Dynatrace review and pricing or the Grafana Cloud review and pricing. You can also browse other Dynatrace alternatives we track.