Dust vs Mem0
Dust vs Mem0, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dust is on 64/100 and Mem0 on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Dust
- our overall score: 64/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 143 against 21
- headcount growth: +500.0% against -37.6%
- LinkedIn following: 36,142 against 18,584
Mem0
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 32/100
- funding raised: $24.0M against $15.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Dust | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform for building and deploying custom AI agents connected to company knowledge and tools. | Persistent memory layer for AI agents and applications. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Large Language Model | Agentic AI, AI Infrastructure, Foundation Model, Retrieval Augmented Generation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dust | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 143 | 21 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | -37.6% |
| Total funding | $15.0M | $24.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 36,142 | 18,584 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dust | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 10/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 61/100 | 49/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dust | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Dust | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Custom AI Agent Building, Context-Aware Infrastructure, Universal Access Layer, Advanced AI Model Support, Enterprise-Grade Security & Compliance, Multi-tool Agent Capabilities | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Dust | Mem0 |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 1.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Dust vs Mem0: common questions
Which is better, Dust or Mem0?
On our 0-100 score Dust rates higher (64/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dust and Mem0 compare on the numbers?
Dust leads on our overall score (64/100 against 56/100), headcount (143 against 21), headcount growth (+500.0% against -37.6%), LinkedIn following (36,142 against 18,584). Mem0 leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 32/100), funding raised ($24.0M against $15.0M).
Read the full Dust review and pricing or the Mem0 review and pricing. You can also browse other Dust alternatives we track.